Epidemiological and obstetric profile of pregnant women with premature in a public maternity in Goiânia
Keywords:
Parto prematuro, Gestação, Perfil sócio-demográficoAbstract
Introduction: Pregnancy is a physiological phenomenon that can involve complications in the process of pregnancy and giving birth. Among them, Premature Labor (PPT), which represents a challenge for current public health and an aggravating factor for perinatal health, given that premature birth is the biggest risk factor for infant morbidity and mortality in the world. Objectives: To describe the epidemiological and obstetric profile of pregnant women with preterm birth. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive and retrospective study with a quantitative approach. Results: 145 medical records of pregnant women attended at the Hospital and Maternity Dona Íris, from February to August and who had premature labor were analyzed. The women's age ranged from 13 to 43 years (27.83±6.38) and the mean gestational age at delivery was 34.36±2.39 (24 to 36 weeks). These were single women (61.4%), with an education level of around 8 years of study, that is, complete high school (45.5%), followed by complete higher education (13.1%) and incomplete high school (12.4%). Regarding the health profile, the most frequent blood type was O+, followed by A+ and B+, representing 36.6; 31.0 and 12.4%, respectively. When performing serology for HIV and Syphilis, 9 (6.2%) cases of gestational syphilis were reported, all women who had a rapid HIV test result were non-reactive. It was observed that most women did not have comorbidities during pregnancy (65.5%) and of those who did (13.1%), the most prevalent were Pregnancy-Specific Hypertensive Disease, followed by Gestational Diabetes mellitus (6.9 %). As for gestational outcomes, most deliveries were cesarean, and single-fetus pregnancy (79.3%). Analysis of the women's obstetric history shows that the majority (31.0%) of women had two previous pregnancies, followed by 23.4% with one and three pregnancies, respectively. Regarding previous births, there was a predominance of two births (33.8%), followed by one and three births, with 31.7 and 17.2%, respectively. Abortion cases were observed in 23.5% of women. The minimum number of prenatal consultations was none and the maximum was 15, with a mean of 6.12±2.78 consultations. Most women (15.9%) had seven appointments, followed by 14.5% with eight appointments and 12.4% with five and six appointments, respectively. Regarding neonatal outcomes, Apgar scores ranged from 0 to 10 (7.31±2.0) for the first minute and 0 to 10 (8.60±1.65) for the fifth minute. Conclusion: The sociodemographic profile is of women with an average age of 27 years, single and having completed high school. The characterization of clinical and obstetric conditions and blood type O+, non-reactive for syphilis and HIV and no comorbidities. With two previous pregnancies, two births, no miscarriages and a single fetus. The obstetric cause that most contributed to premature labor was the Premature Rupture of Membranes (ROPREMA).
References
Pereira SSM, Oliveira MNJ, Koller JMRC, Miranda FCA, Ribeiro IP, Oliveira ADS. Perfil de Gestantes Acometidas de Parto Prematuro em uma Maternidade Pública. J. Res.: fundam. Care, 2018;3(10):758-763.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Gestação de alto risco: manual técnico / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. 5. ed. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 2010.
Montenegro CAB, Rezende-Filho J. Rezende Obstetrícia. 13 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2017.
Leal MD, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RM, Dias MA, Moreira ME, Gama SG. Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):127. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0230-0. PMID: 27766978; PMCID: PMC5073982.
Bouchet N, Gayet-Ageron A, LumbrerasAreta M, Pfister RE, Martinez de Tejada B. Avoiding late preterm deliveries to reduce neonatal complications: an 11- year cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1650-8. PMID: 29310615; PMCID: PMC5759878.
Oliveira RS, Brito MLS, Costa Neto DB. Uma análise integral do Trabalho de Parto Prematuro. Revista de Patologia do Tocantins, 2019;6(1):54-57.
Who. World Health Organization. Preterm birth. World Health Organization 2016. Disponível em:. Acesso em 30 de mar 2021.
Souza DML, Maia LCS, Zêgo ZDF, Jaeger GP, Maciel WS. Prevalence of prematurity and associated factors in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Braz. J. Hea. Rev., 2019; 2(5):4052-4070.
TabilePM, Teixeira RM, Toso G, Matras RC, Fuhrmann IM, Pires MC, Assmann LL. Características dos partos pré-termo em hospital de ensino do interior do Sul do Brasil: análise de 6 anos. Revista da AMRIGS, Porto Alegre, 2016;60(3).
Morisaki N, Togoobaatar G, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Rowland Hogue CJ, Jayaratne K, Ota E, Mori R; WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Risk factors for spontaneous and provider-initiated preterm delivery in high and low Human Development Index countries: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG. 2014 Mar;121 Suppl 1:101-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12631. PMID: 24641540.
Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES, Azevedo LM, Evangelista CB. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Oct-Dec;13(4):618-26. doi: 10.1590/S1679- 45082015RW3127. Epub 2015 Jun 9. PMID: 26061075; PMCID: PMC4878642.
Santos NL, Costa COM, Amaral MTR, Vieira GO, Bacelar LB, Almeida AHV. Gravidez na adolescência: análise de fatores de risco para baixo peso, prematuridade e cesariana. CiênSaúde Coletiva, 2014;19(3):719-26.
Carvalho FC, Rocha AM, Calil LF, Oliveira SM, Pires CAB, Pascoal CKP. Fatores de risco maternos mais prevalentes relacionados à ocorrência de partos prematuros: revisão de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Surgery and Clinical Research. v. 26, n. 1, p. 112-123, 2021.
Araújo FG, Oliveira SR de, Menezes GAC, Meira, DCS. Assistência pré-natal na percepção de mães de prematuros internados em unidade neonatal. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE, 2014; 8(8): 2667-2675.
Almeida AC, Jesus ACP, Lima PFT, Araújo MFM, Araújo TM. Fatores de risco maternos para prematuridade em uma maternidade pública de Imperatriz-MA. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem., 2012; (33):2:86-94.
Borbolato BM, Cardoso MP. O impacto do pré-natal na prevenção do parto prematuro. Revista Thêma et Scientia, 2015; 5(1).
Ferreira Junior AR, Albuquerque RAS, Aragão SR, Rodrigues MENG. Perfil epidemiológico de mães e recém-nascidos prematuros. Revista Enfermagem Contemporânea, 2018; 7(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3378rec.v7i1.1159
Brasil. Ministério da Educação; Secretaria de EducaçãoBásica, Diretoria de Concepções e Orientações Curriculares para a EducaçãoBásica. Jovens de 15 a 17 anos no ensino fundamental: caderno de reflexões. Brasilia, 2011.
Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GC, Pell JP, Nelson SM. Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2014 Nov 15;384(9956):1749-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(14)61135-1. Epub 2014 Sep 15. PMID: 25236409.
Oliveira LL, Gonçalves AC, Costa JSD, Bonilha ALL. Fatores maternos e neonatais relacionados à prematuridade. Ver EscEnferm USP., 2016;50(3): 382-289.
Reddy UM, Zhang J, Sun L, Chen Z, Raju TN, Laughon SK. Neonatal mortality by attempted route of delivery in early preterm birth. Am J ObstetGynecol. 2012;207(2):117. e1-117.e1178. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.023