Breast implants
anatomical x round
Keywords:
Breast, Silicone, Round, AnatomicAbstract
This study aims to review the literature on cosmetic breast surgery and breast implants. The choice of implant shape (round or anatomical) is one of the most essential, yet controversial, decisions in cosmetic breast augmentation. Many surgeons choose the implant shape based on personal experience. The anatomical breast implant is indicated for patients who want a natural appearance as it provides greater projection in the central portion of the breast and is recommended for those who have breasts constrained at the lower pole and thoracic hypoplasia. The round breast implant, on the other hand, offers a more artificial appearance of the breast and is recommended for those who have deficient volume in the upper pole, pseudoptosis and small asymmetries and indicated for patients with good skin quality or who require smaller volumes.
References
Ramachandran K. Breast augmentation. Indian J Plast Surg. 2008 Oct;41(Suppl):S41-7. PMID: 20174542; PMCID: PMC2825138.
Berry MG, Davies DM. Breast augmentation: Part I--A review of the silicone prosthesis. J PlastReconstrAesthetSurg. 2010 Nov;63(11):1761-8. doi: 10.1016/j. bjps.2009.07.047. Epub 2009 Aug 27. PMID: 19713165.
ISAPS https://www.isaps.org/medical-professionals/ isaps-global-statistics/:acessado em7 de julho de 2020 às 17:55h.
Adams WP Jr. Breast augmentation. 1st edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2011.
Adams WP Jr, Small KH. The Process of Breast Augmentation with Special Focus on Patient Education, Patient Selection and Implant Selection. ClinPlastSurg. 2015 Oct;42(4):413-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.001. PMID: 26408433.
Maximiliano J, Oliveira ACP, Lorencetti E, Bombardelli J, Portinho CP, Deggerone D, et al. Mamoplastia de aumento: correlação entre o planejamento cirúrgico e as taxas de complicações pós-operatórias. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást.2017;32(3):332-338.
Cheng F, Cen Y, Liu C, Liu R, Pan C, Dai S. Round versus Anatomical Implants in Primary Cosmetic Breast Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. PlastReconstrSurg. 2019 Mar;143(3):711-721. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005371. PMID: 30601325.
Paula PRS. Estudo descritivo e grau de satisfação de pacientes submetidos a implantes mamários de menor projeção em pólo superior. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást.2010;25(1):168-178
Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams WP Jr, Germann G, Scheflan M, Maxwell GP. Anatomicaland Round Breast Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use. PlastReconstrSurg. 2015 Aug;136(2):263-272. doi: 10.1097/ PRS.0000000000001474. PMID: 26218376.
Fardo D; Pensler JM. Breast, Augmentation. [Updated 2019 Dec 16]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482206/
Michalopoulos K. The effects of breast augmentation surgery on future ability to lactate. Breast J. 2007 Jan- -Feb;13(1):62-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2006.00364.x. PMID: 17214795.
Mallucci P, Branford OA. Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. PlastReconstrSurg. 2014 Sep;134(3):436-447. doi: 10.1097/ PRS.0000000000000485. PMID: 25158703.
Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML. Breast augmentation. PlastReconstr Surg. 2006 Dec;118(7 Suppl):188S-196S; discussion 197S-198S. doi: 10.1097/01. PRS.0000135945.02642.8B. PMID: 17099502
Shridharani SM, Bellamy JL, Mofid MM, Singh NK. Breast augmentation. Eplasty. 2013 Jun 13;13:ic46. PMID: 23840915; PMCID: PMC3685325.
Czerny V. Plastischer Ersatz der BrustdrüsedurcheinLipom. ZentralblChir., 1895; 1(22):72.
Wright T, Wong CS, Schaffner AD. Breast Implants. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020-2019.
Cronin TD; Gerow FJ. Augmentation Mammaplasty: A New “Natural Feel” Prosthesis. In: Broadbent TR; Owens N; Anderson R; Mills JT; Peer LA; Walker JCJR.Eds. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Breast implant design. Gland Surg. 2017 Apr;6(2):148-153. doi: 10.21037/gs.2016.11.09. PMID: 28497018; PMCID: PMC5409902.
Lund HG Jr, Kumpf AL. Aestheticbreastsurgery: emergingtrendsandtechnologies. Mo Med. 2010 May-Jun;107(3):203-9. PMID: 20629290; PMCID: PMC6188320.
Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. PlastReconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):421e-432e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006510. PMID: 31985660.
Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-yearresultsfromtheNatrelle 410 anatomicalform-stable silicone breastimplant core study. AesthetSurg J. 2015 Feb;35(2):145-55. doi: 10.1093/asj/sju084. Erratum in: AesthetSurg J. 2015 Nov;35(8):1044. PMID: 25717116; PMCID: PMC4399443.
Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, McGuire PA, Adams WP Jr, Deva AK. BreastImplantIllness: A Way Forward. PlastReconstrSurg. 2019 Mar;143(3S A Review ofBreastImplant-Associated AnaplasticLargeCellLymphoma):74S-81S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005573. PMID: 30817559.
Tavares-Filho JM, Franco D, Franco T. Round versus anatomical breast implants: algorithm for choosing the appropriate form. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást.2015;30(3):413-422
Cárdenas-Camarena L, Encinas-Brambila J. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Sep;33(5):743-51. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9370-8. Epub 2009 May 30. PMID: 19484175.
